Informal Opinion Number: 20000237
QUESTION: Attorney is a member of Firm. One of the partners, X, joined Firm several months ago. X has not represented E since joining Firm. Attorney commenced representation of a claim involving breach of contract concerning the sale of real estate on behalf of B against defendant D. In the course of completing discovery in that matter, Attorney sought to take the deposition of the real estate broker who represented D. E was the broker. Prior to joining Firm, X represented E in a completely unrelated matter, which concluded a couple of years ago. At some point, Attorney may find it necessary to amend the petition to include E. Attorney has concluded that E’s involvement as a witness presents no violation of the ethical rules. Attorney also believes that given the pending development in which E may be added as a defendant, likewise presents no violation based on the fact pattern. B has waived any conflict in writing. Is there a conflict?
ANSWER: Regardless of whether E is added as a defendant or continues as a witness, Attorney must analyze this situation under Rule 4 dash–1.9(b). If X obtained any information in the course of the previous representation of E that could be used to E’s detriment in the current proceeding, Attorney’s firm has a conflict. The information that could create a conflict could have come from any source, if it came to X in the course of representing E. If Attorney’s firm has a conflict, E would be the one to waive the conflict, although it would be necessary to inform B of the situation.
Request an Informal Opinion.
© Copyright 2026