Informal Opinion Number: 20030003
QUESTION: Attorney was the second attorney hired to represent the client on a personal injury matter. Can Attorney represent the client on a contingency fee basis or must Attorney charge only an hourly rate?
ANSWER: Attorney is ethically permitted to charge a reasonable fee based upon the work that Attorney has done for the client. No provision of the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits Attorney, as successor counsel, from charging a contingency fee, as long as that fee is reasonable. The total fee the client is charged must be reasonable in light of all of the circumstances, including the reasonable fee to which the previous attorney is entitled.This opinion does not affect the authority of the court to rule on the fees for Attorney and the previous attorney in this case. Some cases that may be of interest or assistance in this type of situation are:
Goldstein and Price, L.C. v. Tonkin & Mondl, L.C., 974 S.W.2d 543 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998).
Turpin v. Anderson, 957 S.W.2d 421 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997).
Reid v. Reid, 950 S.W.2d 289 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997).
Kansas City Area Transportation Authority v. 4550 Main, 893 S.W.2d 861 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995).
International Materials v. Sun Corp., 824 S.W.2d 890 (Mo. banc 1992).
Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc., 636 S.W.2d 53 (Mo. banc 1982).
Baker v. Whitaker, 887 S.W.2d 664 (Mo. App. W.D. 1994).
Request an Informal Opinion.
© Copyright 2026