Informal Opinion Number: 2017-07
Adoption Date: 2017
Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule
Question: Does Attorney have a conflict of interest in joining a firm that represents Client B, where Client B has interests adverse to Client A represented by Attorney’s current firm, while Attorney has not entered an appearance on behalf of Client A, and Attorney did not handle Client A’s matter on a day-to-day basis or communicate with Client A, but Attorney represented Client A at depositions and filed motions on behalf of Client A?
Answer: Because Attorney has represented Client A, Rule 4 dash–1.9(a) governs Attorney’s duty to Client A after Attorney leaves the firm representing Client A and joins the firm representing Client B. Rule 4 dash–1.9(a) prohibits Attorney from representing Client B in the same or substantially related matter in which Client B’s interests are materially adverse to those of Client A unless Client A gives its informed consent, confirmed in writing. Unless Client A gives that consent, Attorney’s conflict of interest will be imputed to the other lawyers at the new firm by Rule 4 dash–1.10(a). Missouri does not recognize screening under Rules 4 dash–1.10 or 4 dash–1.9. The new firm’s disqualification may be waived by Client A under the conditions stated in Rule 4 dash–1.7. See Rule 4 dash–1.10(c).
Request an Informal Opinion.
© Copyright 2026