Informal Opinion Number: 990050
Reference Note: Effective July 1, 2007, Rule 4 dash–1.7 was amended. This opinion is based on Rule 4 dash–1.7 in effect prior to that date.
QUESTION: Attorney´s firm is defending Client A in a lawsuit filed by Plaintiff. Plaintiff is represented by Law Firm C. Attorney´s firm has been contacted by Law Firm C about a possible merger. Both firms recognize that a merger between the two firms cannot take place during the pendency of the lawsuit. Is it unethical for Attorney´s firm to discuss a merger with Law Firm C while the lawsuit is pending against Client A? If it is not ethical for these discussions to continue, is it necessary for Attorney´s firm to disclose to Client A the fact that Attorney´s firm was contacted and met with representatives of Law Firm C?
ANSWER: Discussions regarding merger with Law Firm C create a conflict of interest under Rule 4 dash–1.7(b). Attorney may continue those discussions only if Attorney makes full disclosure to Client A and Client A consents. Even if the discussions do not proceed, if a future merger is still under consideration, the fact should be disclosed to Client A.
Request an Informal Opinion.
© Copyright 2026